I tested all the distros listed in that article, and I settled on those that offered the best value for time and resources. I have several old, low-powered machines collecting dust, and the last time I wrote an article on lightweight distros, that exploration revived many of those machines. There are many lightweight distributions out there, each with pros and cons. You have powerful hardware, but you want to keep system resources for your applications and not for the OS use cases can be multimedia production systems or media center PCs. You have really underpowered hardware like Raspberry Pi or Pine 64. You have really old hardware and you want to get some use out of it. Generally, you need a lightweight distro in any of these three cases: However, lightweight distros are also ideal in situations where there is a very resource-intense workflow, like video or audio editing, and you want to get maximum performance out of your hardware. There is is a general perception that lightweight distros are meant for reviving old hardware or for running on really low-powered devices. The only difference between cars and operating systems is that lightweight operating systems, unlike lightweight cars, can do all of the heavy lifting that a Humvee can do. You can also get a monster OS that devours all system resources (CPU and RAM) or you can choose one that barely sips resources. Operating systems are like cars: you can get a power-hungry Humvee that guzzles gas, leaving you with a few miles to drive, or you can get a super-efficient smart car that barely sniffs gas and gives you hundreds of miles of range.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |